
My #1 photo on Flickr as ranked
by "Interestingness"
Back on January 11th, when I first wrote about using Flickr to archive photos, I promised to follow-up with more information on keywords and groups. These tools serve organizational purposes, help users explore each others work and allow users to interact with one another. In other words, Flickr's easy-to-use photo archiving system also functions as one of the Internet's more popular social networking sites.
Having gone to school when e-mail was the exciting technology of the day, I don't (yet) have the online social networking expertise of the Facebook/MySpace generation, but as a blogger and Flickr user, I have come to rely on this type of collaborative technology. So have many others. According to Alexa Traffic Rankings Flickr is currently the 20th most popular Web site in the U.S.
Networking on Flickr makes sense for the most basic reason—users like to share photos with friends and family. Even the earliest online photo sites provided a method to share links with friends. After mom and I went sailing in Maine this fall, all I had to do was upload the photos and send her the link to the Maine 2006 set I'd created. I keep my photos public, but if I'd wanted to restrict them I could also limit access to specific Flickr or Yahoo users.
The fact that I keep my photos public, and use tags (key words) also makes it easier for my other friends and associates to find my photos. Later this fall I took photos at our Halloween party at the Natural History Museum. As a member of the Nature League committee I take photos at most of our parties so that I can share them with other attendees and so that our designer can use them on invitations for future parties. (Speaking of which, our Night Under the Stars party is this Friday. If you are over 21, have at least a passing interest in science, the outdoors or good parties, please join us. Learn more on our site.) After that last party, the committee sent out a link before I'd even sent it to them. My friend Jim had gone to Flickr, done a search on "Nature League" and "Halloween" and found the photos on his own.
I add tags in batches as I upload. In the case of an event it is easy to find multiple tags such as "Nature League" that apply to all the photos in a given batch. Thus instead of viewing Nature League events one by one, I can choose to look at all photos with that tag. I can also further customize the images by adding more unique tags to individual photos. For example after uploading the Halloween photos I could select all of the ones of Mary and add a "Mary" tag to them. If I did this every time I added pictures of Mary then in the future I'd be able to look at an "album" of all photos bearing the "Mary" tag. Users can also subscribe to RSS feeds for specific tags.
If your photos are publicly available you should, in most cases, avoid tagging images by the person's full name so as to protect their privacy. If the photos were taken at a public event such as a Nature League party, and the user has given you permission to post this information you may have more leeway. If in doubt either leave off the name or consult an attorney.
If you have an interest in photos taken by certain people, you can also choose to make them your contacts. Practically speaking this is rather like bookmarking by photographer, except that it goes two ways. You can see a list of all the people you choose as contacts (those whose photos you want to view) as well as a list of all the people who have chosen you as a contact. My contacts include a few friends, as well as people I may not know, who happen to shoot photos of Cleveland and other topics that interest me. For example, one of these contacts posts intriguing images of signage taken throughout greater Cleveland.
The people who have chosen me as a contact are those same friends, some of my contacts, and a few others who just stumbled upon my photos. If someone makes you a contact you can usually figure out why by looking at their photos or viewing their profile. Often there is a common theme. Others are more ambiguous. One of the people on my list is a fellow from Spain who has only 12 shots on his account. I have yet to understand the connection.

One of my shots from the Case group
While it is handy to keep track of contacts with related interests, you can also follow topics by groups. Flickr groups allow multiple users to post images on a certain topic or theme and to talk about issues pertaining to the theme via a group discussion board. There are oodles of different groups, including one for Case Western Reserve University. That group doesn't generate a lot of discussion but it does have 20 members who so far have posted 168 images of the university. Groups provide a good way to share images on a certain topic and to drive traffic to your photos.
I hadn't really paid much attention to groups until I received an e-mail from a fellow in Quebec asking me to upload an image I had taken to his Kansai International Airport group. (Flickr has an internal e-mail system that allows users to communicate with one another without revealing other e-mail addresses or names.) Once I finally got around to joining the group and uploading the image I decided to search for other groups and found the group for Case as well as some for Cleveland and Frank Gehry's architecture. I joined the last one because I've taken far more photos of PBL then anyone could possibly need—there always seems to be a new interesting angle to it. Joining that group made the PBL photo, at the top of this page, my number #1 shot based on "interestingness."
Interestingness is the way Flickr ranks photos based on how many times they've been viewed, who has viewed them, how they are tagged, and other parameters. Flickr has a page in which they showcase the most interesting photos from all users, but you can also see rankings for your own photos.
This system perplexed me at first because for a long time my highest ranked photo was a rather "uninteresting" shot of 2 people sitting on a rock. At the time 14 people had viewed the photo and one had marked it as a favorite (you can make an image a favorite in the same way you can bookmark a Web page). After I joined the Gehry group and uploaded some shots of PBL, one of those moved to the top of the list. It has now been viewed 35 times, 3 people have marked it as a favorite, and one person has left a comment (you can also comment on photos just as you would comment to a blog entry). The system now seems more logical. Initially there wasn't sufficient data to rank my photos effectively. I needed to drive more traffic to the site for the parameters to work properly.
It may not, especially if you don't take many photos. But if you do, you may be able to use Flickr's networking tools to share images with others (fellow researchers sharing pics of amoebas, members of the campus curling club, etc.). You can also use Flickr to drive traffic to your site.
By posting images on topic X to group X, leaving comments on images and making contacts, you will bring people to your Flickr page. If they want to find out more about you they can visit your profile page—on which you can include the link to your Web site on topic X. You can also drive traffic to your site by posting useful comments and links on the appropriate group discussion boards. If your hobby or research interest is one that can be represented through photographs, then you too can network through photography.
If not, your Aunt Polly in Tulsa would probably still very much like to see the photos of your new puppy and your vacation in the Catskills.
Comment by Heidi Cool — February 27, 2007 @5:19 pm
Comment by Photub — March 27, 2007 @8:57 pm
Comment by Ajeet — April 5, 2007 @11:17 am
Comment by HDR Photography — April 22, 2007 @4:59 am
Comment by A Marques — May 11, 2007 @7:44 pm
Comment by Heidi Cool — May 14, 2007 @11:47 am
Comment by Bill Springer — June 18, 2007 @10:49 am
Comment by WD-NYC designer — June 18, 2007 @9:54 pm
Comment by classicyachting — July 3, 2007 @6:38 pm
Comment by Heidi Cool — July 3, 2007 @7:34 pm
Comment by Andy — July 30, 2007 @8:24 pm
Comment by ScubaDiving — September 4, 2007 @10:26 am
Comment by Heidi Cool — September 4, 2007 @3:23 pm
Comment by Rick Rouse — December 27, 2007 @10:26 am
Comment by Faceman — January 19, 2008 @2:39 pm
Comment by Spain Fan — February 25, 2008 @7:17 am
Comment by Abi — March 1, 2008 @1:52 am
Comment by michael — April 23, 2008 @1:25 am
Comment by Joe — October 23, 2008 @10:16 pm
Comment by franso — July 8, 2009 @3:57 pm