When I wrote about the goals, history and move of the Web Development Blog, I mentioned that the move would present some marketing challenges. Specifically I wondered how long it would take to transition readers to the new location so that readership would equal, then surpass the levels I had on the old site. In conversations I've had with many of you both online and in the real world I've promised to share my progress. It's now been just over a month since the Web Development Blog moved to it's new home, so today I thought I'd update you on the progress I've made so far and the strategies I've employed.
While I'm not going to share exact numbers, you can see from the following table that readership for the first month is now equal to 20% of readership at the old location. I'd love to tell you that I'd hit 100% already, but I think reaching 20% in one month is actually pretty good. I'm currently attaining numbers I didn't reach until 17 months after originally launching the Web Development Blog at the old location.
The new site has 2 advantages compared to the original launch. 1) It has several years of content, so over time search traffic will grow. 2) The old site links to the new from several pages so readers of the old blog will be able to easily find the new one. These factors will continue to contribute to readership growth over the months to come.
The new site has the same disadvantage as the old one. I don't blog as often as many bloggers do. Each new entry provides new opportunities to gain traffic. This will be the fourth entry posted since the transition. Increasing my posting frequency (while maintaining quality) is probably the number one thing I could do to grow readership more swiftly. Alas, I have Web sites to build (though if you need a Web site or consultation I am happy to take on new clients), advice to give, and a special project I'm working on, so my goal for the time being will be to try to post once per week. If I can change that to something more frequent, I will.
| Data | Old site Jan-Feb 09 | New site Feb-Mar 09 |
|---|---|---|
| Unique Visitors (month) | 5x | x |
| Average Visitors per day | 5y | y |
| Average pages viewed | 2.94 | 3.01 |
| Average Time on Site | 1:33 min | 3:20 min |
| % new visitors | 89.3% | 77.99% |
| % search traffic | 69.83% | 19.46% |
| % referral traffic | 21.43% | 56.89% |
| % direct traffic | 8.74% | 23.65% |
The following table shows the top 10 traffic sources for both the old and the new sites. While there are some overlaps between the two, there are also some differences. Sites such as StumbleUpon and blahblahtech.com that are sending more traffic to the old site do so because they have several pages that link to different entries on the old site. If I write more entries here, that will appeal to users of those sites, then they will start sending traffic to the new site as well.
You'll also notice that the new site is getting 2 types of Google traffic. Organic traffic is coming from people using Google search. Referral traffic is mostly likely coming from Google Reader and from the RSS feeds. I'm using Feedburner for RSS and Google now owns that.
Additionally, the new site is getting traffic from sites that weren't sending much traffic to the old site. This is partly due to happenstance and partly due to my marketing endeavors.
| Old Site Jan-Feb 09 | New site Feb-Mar 09 |
|---|---|
| case.edu | blog.case.edu |
| stumbleupon.com | direct |
| google.com (organic) | google.com (organic) |
| twitter.com | twitter.com |
| images.google.com | linkedin.com |
| bloghighed.org | stumbleupon.com |
| backtype.slinkset.com | friendfeed.com |
| ariwriter.com | bloghighed.org |
| blahblahtech.com | facebook.com |
| heidicool.com | google.com (referral) |
Given my other projects I can only devote so much time to marketing the blog, thus I try to focus on the strategies that will be most effective. Here are a few tactics I've employed in the past month.
As I've mentioned on several occasions, leaving relevant comments on other blogs is a great way to generate traffic and forge connections with fellow bloggers. Some companies hire staff who spend all day scouring the Web to find blogs and comment upon them. Often these are the types of spammy or irrelevant comments that I must delete from my own blog, so I don't take the same approach. Instead I comment organically.
I'm subscribed to many Web development and marketing blogs that I read or skim on a regular basis. Additionally friends send links to interesting blog entries on Twitter, FriendFeed, StumbleUpon, etc. If I happen to read a blog entry that interests me, AND if I have something to say that I think will add value to that blog's readers, then I will make a comment on the post. When I do that, my name will typically link back here to the blog. If I've already written an entry on the same topic, I can also include a link to that entry within the comment.
I use http://twitterfeed.com/ to automatically Tweet new blog entries as they are posted. Since these automated Tweets compose but a small fraction of my overall Tweets this isn't considered spam. (It would be if I only used Twitter to promote my content.) I also share links to specific blog entries in response to questions people ask on Twitter.
For instance if someone asks "What is SEO?" I can Tweet something like "SEO is a method to make sites more findable via search engines. Learn more at http://www.heidicool.com/blog/2007/07/13/an-introduction-to-search-engine-optimization-seo-part-1/." If the Tweet is more than 140 characters I can substitute a tinyURL for the full link. As with blog comments, I only do this if the blog entry I'm sharing answers their question in a useful way.
Luckily I've been writing this blog for several years now, so I actually have quite a few blog entries that pertain to questions I see on Twitter. If I've not already written on the topic, the question may inspire a new entry, so it's a good way for me to get ideas too.
Technically Facebook is still on my to-do list. I need to create a new Facebook page for the blog, perhaps a new Web Development Group or both—anyone have a preference? I have, however been using the Facebook application, RSS-Connect to publish the RSS feed of my most recent blog posts to my own Facebook page. While I updated the application to use the new feed, I think the real reason it is generating more traffic is because of the recent changes Facebook made to all of our pages. This feed is simply more visible now than it was before. I also announced the blog move in one status message, but I don't know that this generated hordes of traffic.
LinkedIn's WordPress and Blog Link applications make it easy to share your RSS feeds to your LinkedIn profile. I'm also using the Blog Link application to publish my Google Reader Share links there. Additionally I've included a link to the blog in my profile. These are all things one can easily set-up in a few minutes. But LinkedIn's Answers area is what is probably making the biggest impact.
I started answering questions on LinkedIn Answers for the usual reason, to enhance my reputation and profile. When you answer questions on LinkedIn, the person posting the question can select which is the best answer. If yours is selected, that information is added to your profile indicating that you have expertise in the subject area.
It's great for the ego, and the profile, to have an answer selected as the best, but that's just the tip of the iceberg. Answering LinkedIn questions is rewarding on a number of levels. LinkedIn gives you a place to write your response and add links to up to 3 sites that augment your answer in some way. Typically I write a fairly comprehensive answer and include links to sites that will offer more details or clarification. If the question pertains to something I've already written about, I can include links to my own supporting materials. By linking to my own entries I can provide more specific information while also promoting my blog. This serves both the person who asked the question and me.
While I've only been answering questions for a few weeks, I have discovered a special trick to earning a best answer: read the question carefully and answer what was asked as accurately and clearly as possible. There's nothing magic about that, but I've seen quite a few answers that don't seem to follow this simple rule.
Last but not least, social media is people, and that includes LinkedIn. In the process of answering questions I've met several interesting people who I've added not only to my LinkedIn network but also to Twitter and Facebook. Conversing with them has given me new insights on different marketing and social media practices as well as ideas for future blog entries. They also have a good sense of humor and are simply fun people to know.
As I employ new strategies or reach new growth milestones, I'll write additional posts monitoring the progress of the blog. In the meantime you can find more tips and ideas in my marketing entries.
Today's the last day. Read Learning for fun and adventure: online education comes in many flavors between March 18-30th, and click on the red "Edu Blogger Scholarship" image. Every click made during that time period brings me one step closer to the finals.
p.s. The marketing portion of the Edu Blogger Scholarship has now ended, and I made the finals! Thank you all for your support. You can view the list of finalists, and read their blogs at http://www.onlinecollege.org/. For those of you in higher education, I recommend taking a look, there are some great resources there. Cheers!
Comment by Tom Goering — March 30, 2009 @9:38 pm
Trackback by NavyCS (Tom Goering) — March 30, 2009 @9:50 pm
Trackback by euneakme (Lavinia Scott) — March 31, 2009 @4:53 am
Comment by mahita — April 1, 2009 @6:33 am
Comment by glenn — April 9, 2009 @7:28 pm
Comment by Stephanie Cockerl — April 27, 2009 @8:07 pm