At one time or another we've all come across a Web site that seemed heavy on features but low on content. Once upon a time, someone read that Internet users have a short attention span and are attracted to shiny objects like really big photos, videos and animation. Others followed suit and started building sites that looked pretty cool, but really didn't have much to say.
I shot this video riding the Health Line up Euclid
Avenue. The quality is a bit dodgy and it isn't necessary
to tell my story, except as an example of unnecessary
use of video. Audio by Jacinda
Espinosa / CC
BY-NC 3.0. While I didn't discuss audio in this post, if you
do a Google search, you'll find plenty of sources for royalty-free or Creative
Commons licensed audio.
While it is true that long sections of text can seem more daunting on a Web page than in a book, that doesn't mean visitors don't read. Nor does it mean we have to throw out our words and replace them with video and pictures.
Instead we can pay attention to our line-lengths, break text into small chunks, use bulleted lists and add images or other media selectively, to enhance—not replace—our main message. Carefully chosen media can help us communicate, while poorly chosen imagery and video only serve to distract. Finding appropriate media can sometimes be a challenge, so today I'm going to discuss some options for finding/creating media that is suitable for your pages.
Internet users aren't shallow illiterates who will buy your widgets just because your video went viral. That may draw them to your site, but they'll need more to stay there, interact and apply to your law school or download your social media e-book.
Internet users come to your site with the hope that it will help them meet some goal or expectation. They're searching for information that will help them bake a cake, come up with a name for their new puppy, decide which graduate program to apply to, learn how to repair their washing machine, etc.
If we want our content to serve their needs then we need to consider what media will best communicate our message.

I have many dog pictures, but my friend, Ann's dogs, Scout and Kaya, passed away
this fall, so I thought it would be appropriate to honor them here in the cute
canine example.
If you've just populated your database of dog names but only have photos of your pug, then you may be wondering where to get the rest of the puppy pictures you need to illustrate your site. If you've got a big budget then you can hire a photographer or license photos from a stock photography site.
If your budget is smaller, many stock sites also have low-cost or even free images available. You can also do Google and Flickr searches for images that can be licensed under creative commons. If you find a photo that doesn't offer such licensing, contact the photographer and ask if you can use the image. The Internet is a great resource for pictures, just make sure to follow copyright laws and never copy and use an image without the proper permission. Government sites by NASA and the U.S. Library of Congress are also a great source of royalty-free photographs. Both provide very clear terms of service.

Turning Point, by Philip Johnson on the campus of
Case Western Reserve University
If you're a blogger or site owner who can take a decent picture, carry a camera and use it often. When I worked at Case Western Reserve I took photos at various special events, and I would grab the camera when I walked across campus, just to shoot random images—such as this photo of Turning Point—as I happened upon them.
As time went by I developed a rather large collection of campus shots that I could share with our designers, campus Web maintainers and others looking for pictures to use in their projects. To make these easier to find, I archived them on my Flickr account. This way when a request came in, I could just share a link and the requester could download the appropriate picture.
This also made life easier for me as I had thousands of photos to choose from when I needed images for a new Web page. For a campus etiquette dinner event page, I used a picture of a meal I'd eaten. For the transportation page I used a picture of a campus shuttle bus. For the Year of Darwin I used pictures from my vacation in the Galapagos. There were of course rare cases that required stock photography, but in most cases the photos I needed were ones I had already taken.
Building up such an archive may seem daunting, but if you start now—by taking pictures of anything that might relate to your organization or site—you will begin to build up a nice little collection. My friend Josh is currently planning a food related blog. He's now taking pictures of food, from cooking process to plate, whenever we eat together. By the time he launches the site this winter he'll have a variety of images ready for use.
Rottweilers dig video. I found this on YouTube, but my late Rottie, Shiloh used
to watch T. V. and bark at the bad guys when they came on screen. I was never
quite sure how he did that, he'd often bark before the plot had indicated they
were bad. Perhaps it was in the actors' body language.
If you are reading this then you already know that you can embed videos—from popular services like YouTube and Vimeo— on your own site. Continuing on the dog theme, I found countless files to choose from when searching for cute puppies and canines. I chose this Rottie because I rather liked that he was watching video too.
These services are great places to find videos that support your message. But again, it behooves us to be aware of copyrights. While users submit many videos that we can freely use on our own sites, some upload videos from movies and television that may be unauthorized. To be on the safe side, check the source and read the terms of service before embedding. Also note that if you are just copying and pasting the embed code from the video site, it may not validate correctly. If you want to ensure your HTML is standards compliant, try embedding your videos with .swfobject 2.0.
If you have a video camera, you can also begin to build a video archive on these services just as you would build a photo archive on Flickr. Uploading videos to your own YouTube or Vimeo channel is also a good marketing idea as your channels can provide additional pathways to your site. This works most effectively if you take better videos than I do. My YouTube channel doesn't have many videos and they are mostly rather feeble things like driving through Cleveland in the snow.
If you're a serious
videographer you'll want a professional
quality camcorder,
but for more casual shooters, there are many inexpensive options available.
The Flip
Camcorder
is
very popular among bloggers or you can use the built in video features now
available in many phones and digital cameras. I shot the bus video on this
page with the Canon
SD1000
that
I keep in my backpack when I'm not carrying my Canon
EOS 40D
.
The video was an experiment I made in which I held the lens against the
window to try to keep it steady. Alas it turned out to be somewhat more
boring than I'd hoped, but I'm more of a still photographer. I expect you can
do better.

I made this cartoon to illustrate my What I've
Been Reading in the Blogosphere page.
Sometimes we just can't find an image or video that quite serves our needs.
If you want to illustrate how much trouble you have keeping up with all the
blogs you follow, what do you show? Neither a screen capture
of Google Reader nor a photo of a person staring at a computer quite makes
the point. But a
cartoon
showing your thoughts just might. If you can draw, you can create your
cartoon from scratch on paper or using a program such as Illustrator or Photoshop
.
If you can't draw, you still have options. I started using Bitstrips last year to illustrate a presentation I was making. Since then I've made several cartoons—to use here on the blog—when I needed something more specific than a photo. If I had more time I could draw these by hand, but Bitstrips makes it easy to build cartoons quickly and to maintain consistent character styles throughout. Bitstrips is but one of many cartoon creation sites online, I've listed more below.
From text to animation via Xtranormal. If you're active in social media you might also be amused by the one I made called "Robots
in Meatspace".
Similarly if you wanted to show a conversation between, let's say, a Web developer and a client who wants bells and whistles, you might not find it on YouTube. You could hire actors and shoot a video, but that might be expensive.
If you can
draw and know how to use Flash you
can make a nice animation, but it will take even more time than drawing your
own comic strip. (I think it took me about 40 hours to create this
interactive dungeon animation awhile back.)
Flash may give you more control, but new tools like XtraNormal let you write a script, and create an animation— from your text and stock characters—in a fraction of the time. It took me less than an hour to write and create this video about the Behemoth Corporation's Web project.
If your Web site is an online catalog for your diamond jewelry collection, you're not going to grab the point and shoot camera to take the pictures. You'll hire a photographer. If you're promoting a luxury cruise line, you'll hire an agency to produce a professional video.
But whether you're a large university, small business or independent blogger, there are many times when having an image archive, or the ability to create something on the fly, will best suit your needs. There are many tools available, all it takes is a bit of creativity. Also remember, when using non-text media to augment your message, be sure to include alternative content for those with visual, hearing or related impairments. Additional media only adds value if everyone gets the message.
How are you illustrating your sites? Are there other tools you've found that help you develop images and other media to better convey your message? If so, please share them in the comments below.
Need more Web tips? Fan the heidicool.com Facebook page. I'm posting 1 tip/link there per day to offer ongoing advice on Web design, marketing and social media—without overwhelming your Facebook stream.
Trackback by sharierwin (sharierwin) — October 15, 2009 @1:06 pm
Trackback by jcgardner (Joel) — October 15, 2009 @1:18 pm
Comment by Jean Hunt — October 15, 2009 @2:59 pm
I want to agree that in the longer run, good content will win. But I know that:
I am drawn to moving pictures,
I think they're all the rage
Their content may be vacuous
But they keep me on the page
I thought your video of Euclid Avenue was interesting and gave me an insight into the city in which you live.
Maybe that is because I follow you on Twitter, we have exchanged views etc, so I have more invested than I would have in a casual look at a stranger's page. But it still remains the case that I am attracted to moving pictures.
Of course, it is not an 'either - or' situation. Good video should trump poor video. You have inspired me to find out.
Comment by David — October 15, 2009 @3:54 pm
David,
Great poem! And interesting thoughts regarding social media. I too pay closer attention to details when viewing the sites of people I've gotten to know, than I do to others. I think that shows another reason why we need to make connections on social media and not just post post post w/o listening.
Cleveland is pretty cool. We're like a small Chicago, with an industrial history. The greater metro area has a population of about 2,945,831 making us the 14th largest metro area in the U.S. (probably similar to the greater Leeds area) The city itself has lost population with many moving to the suburbs so it ranks 33rd. The bus video was shot from the heart of downtown to University Circle which is our cultural area on the eastern edge of the city. It's about a 15 min. bus ride so I speeded up the video.
I think the biggest surprise for people who've not been to this part of the U.S. is our waterfront. People don't realize how large Lake Erie really is and that we're actually a sizable coastal port. I've had to explain to friends on the East Coast that it looks like the ocean and that one cannot see across the pond to Canada.
You can get a sense of that in my recent sailing pics.
Cheers!
Comment by Heidi Cool — October 15, 2009 @4:26 pm
Comment by Ari Herzog — October 16, 2009 @9:11 pm
Jean,
I'm glad you found it helpful. The archiving solution works particularly well in academia. Especially if multiple people are doing it. For example at Case, the University Programs and Events department also shared photos on Flickr. Their archive was a great resource.
Ari
I didn't say much about audio mostly because the post was getting so long. But you bring up a very important point. Sound should only be used if it helps communicate something specific and it should never be set to autoplay. Music that starts playing unexpectedly can be very jarring to visitors. If they are surfing the Web at lunch in their offices or while working in coffeehouses and libraries it can also be disturbing to others in the room.
While keeping the music off has become a pretty well known best practice, as you mention, there are still too many sites who ignore it. Sites such as you describe have no need for music. If we want to book a hotel or buy a house, some bit of ambient jazz isn't going to impress us. Nor will it push us towards purchasing. Instead it is more likely to push us away.
Sound is more appropriately used for podcasts or for situations such as promoting a CD where listening to samples (by choice) helps visitors decide whether or not to buy. For example, Cleveland Orchestra violist, Eliesha Nelson just released her CD, Quincy Porter: The Complete Viola Works. I built the site a few years ago as she was preparing the recordings, but for her CD launch this fall, we added a music player that will play ~30 second snippets of each song. The player also includes a link to an alternative content page for people using browsers, such as some readers for the visually impaired, that may not support Flash. That page instead includes a listing with links to .mp3 files of the excerpts.
So, I totally agree. We should never provide audio unless there is a logical reason to do so.
Comment by Heidi Cool — October 17, 2009 @2:33 pm
Trackback by tonyramos (The Presentationist) — October 20, 2009 @7:07 am
Comment by Mark Keating — October 28, 2009 @3:26 pm
Thanks Mark!
That's a great example. I can just imagine the meeting where someone said "We want our site to convey how our community let's you be economical and eco-friendly while maintaining a luxurious standard of living. The site should be opulent, yet technically forward...something with a lot of interaction so people can explore floor plans, maps, watch real-time energy savings charts, etc."
Flash is very good at things like interactive maps, but just because one uses Flash for some elements doesn't mean it must be used for everything.
I think a lot of odd choices get made because people get wrapped up in the fun bits like design and forget that they have a more specific mission, to sell houses. If they'd started by asking themselves "what content must we provide to get qualified buyers to fill out our inquiry form?" and "what technology should we use to produce that content" they might have ended up with a very different looking site, one that would have guided visitors to the pages they needed to make an informed purchasing decision. Instead they came up with a site that may have been stunning but caused you to walk away. Granted you may not have been in their target audience, but if the design gets in the way of the message, then something is clearly wrong.
Comment by Heidi Cool — October 28, 2009 @4:26 pm